Disappointed that Mark, like so many other advocates, can’t describe what “victory” looks like and his means (electric grid, reduced fossil fuels, etc) ARE the end.
He hedged when asked what 2050 is like if had his initiatives implemented, but it’s key for activists to be explicit what their ideal end state should look like.
If April 22, 2100 is a couple degrees cooler and there’s 5% less wildfire for the small small price of…everything he wants, is that a trade off most would make?
Being vague about the impact climate change has on our lives (not just nature) and what “victory” is will be to the detriment of their cause.
Disappointed that Mark, like so many other advocates, can’t describe what “victory” looks like and his means (electric grid, reduced fossil fuels, etc) ARE the end.
He hedged when asked what 2050 is like if had his initiatives implemented, but it’s key for activists to be explicit what their ideal end state should look like.
If April 22, 2100 is a couple degrees cooler and there’s 5% less wildfire for the small small price of…everything he wants, is that a trade off most would make?
Being vague about the impact climate change has on our lives (not just nature) and what “victory” is will be to the detriment of their cause.